Repository logo
 

Smith and Rousseau, after Hume and Mandeville

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Sagar, Paul 

Abstract

jats:p This essay re-examines Adam Smith’s encounter with Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Against the grain of present scholarship it contends that when Smith read and reviewed Rousseau’s Second Discourse, he neither registered it as a particularly important challenge, nor was especially influenced by, or subsequently preoccupied with responding to, Rousseau. The case for this is made by examining the British context of Smith’s own intervention in his 1759 Theory of Moral Sentiments, where a proper appreciation of the roles of David Hume and Bernard Mandeville in the formation of Smith’s thought pushes Rousseau firmly into the background. Realising this, however, forces us to re-consider our evaluations of Rousseau’s and Smith’s very different political visions. Given that questions of individual recognition, economic inequality, and political stability remain at the heart of today’s social challenges, the implications of this are not just historical but of direct contemporary import. </jats:p>

Description

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from SAGE via https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591716656459

Keywords

Adam Smith, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, David Hume, Bernard Mandeville, Scottish Enlightenment, commercial society, epicureanism, sociability

Journal Title

POLITICAL THEORY

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

0090-5917
1552-7476

Volume Title

Publisher

SAGE Publications